Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 1798-1802, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-803351

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To explore the effect of standardized grading transport scheme in intrahospital transport of emergency critical patients.@*Methods@#Selected a total of 1 425 critically ill patients from the emergency department in July 2017 - August 2018 as the research object, whom were transported by hospital for completing CT examination, transferring into Angiography Room or specialist ward, December 7, 586 cases of 2017 as control group, in August 1, 839 of 2018 as the observation group. Patients in the control group were transported by conventional transport, while patients in the observation group were transported by standardized graded transport scheme. The hospital transport time and adverse event incidence rates of patients in the two groups were compared.@*Results@#In the observation group, the time taken to complete CT examination, complete CT examination and transfer into angiography room, transfer into specialized wards, transfer into angiography room was respectively (25.70±2.94, 31.05±3.27, 20.04±2.54, 16.29±1.82) points, which was significantly different from (33.65±4.31, 37.12±4.16, 25.46±2.24, 20.20±2.17) points in the control group (t=16.665-26.709, P<0.01). Observation group of patients with nosocomial transhipment adverse events (a decrease in blood pressure, blood oxygen desaturation, accidental extubation, unobstructed intravenous drip, insufficient supply of oxygen, power insufficiency, the insufficient number of drugs and drug kinds) rates were 6.9% (58/839), 8.6% (72/839), 0.2% (2/839), 15.0% (126/839), 4.5% (38/839), 0.9% (8/839), 0.7% (6/839), 0, Significantly lower than the control group of 19.5% (114/586), 22.7% (133/586), 1.5% (9/586), 34.9% (205/586), 26.6% (156/586), 11.9% (70/586), 5.9% (35/586), 3.9% (23/586), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=31.950-106.173, P<0.01).@*Conclusion@#The standardized and graded transport scheme can fully warn patients of various risks in the course of intrahospital transportation, take effective preventive and control measures to ensure the safety of intrahospital transportation of emergency critical patients, and should be popularized.

2.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 1798-1802, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-752732

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the effect of standardized grading transport scheme in intrahospital transport of emergency critical patients. Methods Selected a total of 1 425 critically ill patients from the emergency department in July 2017- August 2018 as the research object, whom were transported by hospital for completing CT examination, transferring into Angiography Room or specialist ward, December 7, 586 cases of 2017 as control group, in August 1, 839 of 2018 as the observation group. Patients in the control group were transported by conventional transport, while patients in the observation group were transported by standardized graded transport scheme. The hospital transport time and adverse event incidence rates of patients in the two groups were compared. Results In the observation group, the time taken to complete CT examination, complete CT examination and transfer into angiography room, transfer into specialized wards, transfer into angiography room was respectively (25.70±2.94, 31.05±3.27, 20.04±2.54, 16.29±1.82) points, which was significantly different from (33.65±4.31, 37.12±4.16, 25.46± 2.24, 20.20±2.17) points in the control group (t=16.665-26.709,P<0.01). Observation group of patients with nosocomial transhipment adverse events (a decrease in blood pressure, blood oxygen desaturation, accidental extubation, unobstructed intravenous drip, insufficient supply of oxygen, power insufficiency, the insufficient number of drugs and drug kinds) rates were 6.9% (58/839), 8.6% (72/839), 0.2% (2/839), 15.0% (126/839), 4.5% (38/839), 0.9% (8/839), 0.7% (6/839), 0, Significantly lower than the control group of 19.5% (114/586), 22.7% (133/586), 1.5% (9/586), 34.9% (205/586), 26.6% (156/586), 11.9% (70/586), 5.9% (35/586), 3.9% (23/586), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=31.950-106.173, P<0.01). Conclusion The standardized and graded transport scheme can fully warn patients of various risks in the course of intrahospital transportation, take effective preventive and control measures to ensure the safety of intrahospital transportation of emergency critical patients, and should be popularized.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL